Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
11 months ago
Dec 15, 2023, 3:29 p.m. EST
Updated:
11 months ago
Dec 15, 2023, 3:28 p.m. EST
I think you have a time-stepping problem. I re-ran your problem, manually forcing it to take 20s time steps and it gave far more believable results. Go to Study --> Solver Configurations --> Solution 1 --> Time-Dependent Solver 1. In the Settings panel, click on Time Settings and change the value of "Steps taken by solver:" from "free" to "Manual." Then change "Time step:" from its default (.01) to some number like 20 (in your case, this is 20 seconds). Then re-run your model and you'll notice a very different result! I encourage you to also experiment with other different time steps and different meshings. Also, your present mesh is too coarse (in my humble opinion), in some places.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
I think you have a *time-stepping* problem. I re-ran your problem, manually forcing it to take 20s time steps and it gave far more believable results. Go to Study --> Solver Configurations --> Solution 1 --> Time-Dependent Solver 1. In the Settings panel, click on Time Settings and change the value of "Steps taken by solver:" from "free" to "Manual." Then change "Time step:" from its default (.01) to some number like 20 (in your case, this is 20 seconds). Then re-run your model and you'll notice a very different result! I encourage you to also experiment with other different time steps and different meshings. Also, your present mesh is too coarse (in my humble opinion), in some places.
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
11 months ago
Dec 15, 2023, 4:03 p.m. EST
I second Robert's view on the coarseness of your mesh. You may want to try a swept mesh, your geometry lends itself to it.
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
I second Robert's view on the coarseness of your mesh. You may want to try a swept mesh, your geometry lends itself to it.
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
11 months ago
Dec 16, 2023, 5:52 a.m. EST
Thank you very much for both of your replies!
Unfortunately both suggestions don't work out for me.
I tried really hard to create a swept mesh but am unable to. I always get errors. I read through the tutorial and tried to gain knowledge from the bipolar transistor example but I simply can't produce a swept mesh.
As for the time-stepping: Once I change it to 20 seconds (I also tried 10s), it produces very weird jumps in temperature, that are also not explainable. I attached an image of the table.
I would be very grateful for additional help.
Thank you very much for both of your replies!
Unfortunately both suggestions don't work out for me.
I tried really hard to create a swept mesh but am unable to. I always get errors. I read through the [tutorial](https://www.comsol.com/support/learning-center/article/Introduction-to-Swept-Meshing-51861/152) and tried to gain knowledge from the [bipolar transistor example ](https://www.comsol.com/model/3d-analysis-of-a-bipolar-transistor-19699) but I simply can't produce a swept mesh.
As for the time-stepping: Once I change it to 20 seconds (I also tried 10s), it produces very weird jumps in temperature, that are also not explainable. I attached an image of the table.
I would be very grateful for additional help.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
11 months ago
Dec 17, 2023, 10:26 a.m. EST
I rebuilt the whole model step by step and found out that the weird results came by adding the vias. Because when adding the vias, I could not create a swept mesh anymore as the vias throw a "Unsupported topology of linking face" error.
That's why I exchanged the vias with cylinders with the same volume as the ring of the via. I can now create a swept mesh and get results that seem plausible.
This is not a solution however, just a workaround.
I rebuilt the whole model step by step and found out that the weird results came by adding the vias. Because when adding the vias, I could not create a swept mesh anymore as the vias throw a "Unsupported topology of linking face" error.
That's why I exchanged the vias with cylinders with the same volume as the ring of the via. I can now create a swept mesh and get results that seem plausible.
This is not a solution however, just a workaround.
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
11 months ago
Dec 18, 2023, 11:07 a.m. EST
Hello Matthias,
Page 850 of the Reference Manual, version 6.1, explains the requirements that your geometry needs to meet for a swept mesh to be possible. This will guide you on how to create your vias correspondingly.
Best,
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
Hello Matthias,
Page 850 of the Reference Manual, version 6.1, explains the requirements that your geometry needs to meet for a swept mesh to be possible. This will guide you on how to create your vias correspondingly.
Best,
Jeff